Analisis yuridis atas perselisihan pembagian harta pailit PT Kertas Leces (Persero)

Hamada, Enrico (2020) Analisis yuridis atas perselisihan pembagian harta pailit PT Kertas Leces (Persero). Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) ilovepdf_merged_watermark.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (4MB)
Preview	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (122kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (136kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter 1) Chapter 1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (370kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter 2) Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (455kB)
	Text (Chapter 3) Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (127kB)
	Text (Chapter 4) Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (664kB)
	Text (Chapter 5) Chapter5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (124kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (271kB) | Preview

Abstract

Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) hingga kini masih menjadi perdebatan panjang bagi para pelaku usaha di Indonesia baik itu pelaku usaha swasta tak terkecuali pelaku usaha dari sektor pemerintah seperti Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Tesis ini membahas mengenai Analisis Yuridis Atas Perselisihan Pembagian Harta Pailit PT Kertas Leces (Persero) (Dalam Pailit). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Saat ini, pengaturan hukum belum ada kejelasan mengenai tata cara pembagian harta pailit yang paten sehingga kerap kali menjadi polemik ketika akan dilaksanakannya pembagian hasil dari penjualan harta pailit kepada para kreditor oleh kurator. Di sisi lain, masalah lain timbul mana kala permohonan lelang yang diajukan oleh separatis masih dalam masa waktu insolvensi namun pelaksanaannya di luar masa waktu insolvensi masuk ke dalam hak separatis atau telah beralih kepada kurator. Dalam tesis ini Penulis mengkaji dan menganalisis dari berbagai prespektif hukum secara mendalam. Penalaran Majelis hakim di tingkat Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya lebih positivistik dengan mengacu aspek formal sesuai pengaturan dalam UU 37/2004; sebaliknya putusan Majelis Hakim di tingkat Kasasi lebih cenderung berdasarkan asas perlindungan hukum dengan mengacu pada UU 4/1996 yang mengatur Hak Tanggungan sebagai salah satu hak yang didahulukan pembayarannya (preference). / Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is still a long debate for business actors in Indonesia, both private business actors, including business actors from the government sector such as State-Owned Enterprises. This thesis discusses the juridical analysis of the dispute over the distribution of bankrupt assets of PT Kertas Leces (Persero) (in bankruptcy). This study uses a normative juridical research method. Currently, there is no clarity in the legal arrangement regarding the procedure for distributing patent bankruptcy assets so that it often becomes a polemic when a curator will share the proceeds from the sale of bankruptcy assets to creditors. On the other hand, another problem arises when the auction application submitted by the separatists is still within the insolvency period but its implementation outside the period of insolvency falls under separatist rights or has been transferred to the curator. In this thesis the writer examines and analyzes various legal perspectives in depth. Reasoning The panel of judges at the Commercial Court level at the Surabaya District Court is more positivistic with reference to the formal aspects in accordance with the provisions in Law 37/2004; On the other hand, the decision of the Panel of Judges at the level of cassation tends to be based on the principle of legal protection by referring to Law 4/1996 which regulates Mortgage Rights as one of the rights that prioritizes payment (preference).

Actions (login required)

View Item