Tanggung jawab notaris terhadap penyimpanan minuta akta dalam hal penerbitan grosse akta pengganti

Barus, Caros Imanuel Tuhervan (2021) Tanggung jawab notaris terhadap penyimpanan minuta akta dalam hal penerbitan grosse akta pengganti. Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) ilovepdf_merged (4).pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
Preview	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (189kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (544kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter1) Chapter1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter2) Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (5MB)
	Text (Chapter3) Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (747kB)
	Text (Chapter4) Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (2MB)
	Text (Chapter5) Chapter5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (281kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (343kB) | Preview

Abstract

Notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya selaku Pejabat Umum mempunyai kewajiban untuk menyimpan minuta akta sebagai bagian dari protokol Notaris sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Namun dalam perjalanannya sering terjadi adanya kehilangan minuta akta. Dari kasus yang diangkat, protokol yang hilang adalah Grosse Akta yang hendak dilekatkan untuk proses Hipotek Kapal. Dari latar belakang tersebut maka muncul permasalahan, Bagaimana tanggung jawab Notaris terkait penyimpanan Minuta Akta serta bagaimana proses pelekatan Hipotek Kapal dengan Grosse Akta Pengganti? Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan, dan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dikaitkan dengan hilangnya Protokol Notaris dalam hal ini Grosse Akta, jika terbukti adanya perbuatan melawan hukum, kerugian dan korelasi antara keduanya maka Notaris dapat diminta pertanggungjawabannya secara perdata. Sedangkan secara Pidana tidak diatur mengenai perbuatan menghilangkan protokol Notaris melainkan terkait pembuatan surat palsu dalam hal ini adalah pembuatan Akta palsu selain itu dari aspek Administratif Notaris dapat diminta pertanggungjawaban seperti yang diatur dalam pasal 85 UUJN mengenai sanksi administratif bagi Notaris, yaitu teguran lisan, tertulis, pemberhentian sementara, pemberhentian dengan hormat maupun pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Dalam hal pelekatan Hipotek Kapal dengan Grosse Akta Pengganti, proses dilalui adalah sama dengan Pelekatan Hipotek Kapal menggunakan Grosse Akta biasa, hanya saja terdapat perbedaan seperti tanggal penerbit, judul akta dan syarat penerbitan. / Notaries in carrying out their positions as General Officials have the obligation to keep the minimum deed as part of the Notary's protocol as regulated in the Law. Invitation on the Position of Notary Public. However, along the way, there is often a loss of the minutes. Of the cases raised, the missing protocol was the Grosse Deed which was to be attached for the Ship Mortgage process. From this background, the problem arises, What is the responsibility of the Notary regarding the deposit of the Minuta Deed and how is the process of attaching the Ship Mortgage with the Replacement Deed Grosse? In this study the authors used a library research method, and used a statutory approach. The notary's responsibility is related to the loss of the Notary Protocol, in this case the Grosse Akta, if it is proven that there is an illegal act, loss and correlation between the two, the Notary can be held accountable in a civil manner. Whereas in a criminal manner it is not regulated regarding the act of eliminating the Notary protocol but in relation to the making of false letters in this case the making of false deeds other than that from the administrative aspect of the Notary public can be held accountable as regulated in article 85 of the UUJN regarding administrative sanctions for Notaries, namely oral, written, temporary dismissal, dismissal with respect or dismissal with respect. In the case of attaching a Ship Mortgage with a Substitute Grosse Deed, the process is the same as for the Ship Mortgage attachment using an ordinary Grosse Deed, except that there are differences such as the date of issuance, title of deed and terms of issue.

Actions (login required)

View Item