Implikasi putusan mahkamah agung no. 97 b/pdt.sus- arbt/2016 dalam sengketa pembatalan putusan arbitrase (analisis putusan mahkamah agung no. 97 b/pdt.sus-arbt/2016)

Manurung, Bobby Christianto (2017) Implikasi putusan mahkamah agung no. 97 b/pdt.sus- arbt/2016 dalam sengketa pembatalan putusan arbitrase (analisis putusan mahkamah agung no. 97 b/pdt.sus-arbt/2016). Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

[img] Text (Title)
Title.pdf

Download (373kB)
[img] Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf

Download (280kB)
[img] Text (ToC)
ToC.pdf

Download (398kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 1)
Chapter 1.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (388kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 2)
Chapter 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (591kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 3)
Chapter 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (368kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 4)
Chapter 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (541kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 5)
Chapter 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (283kB)
[img] Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf

Download (330kB)

Abstract

Ketentuan mengenai pembatalan putusan arbitrase di Indonesia diatur dalam Pasal 70 Undang-undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Pasal tersebut secara limitatif mengatur alasan-alasan apa saja yang dapat dijadikan dasar oleh para pihak untuk mengajukan permohonan pembatalan suatu putusan arbitrase. Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (MARI) No. 97 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016 mengenai gugatan perdata khusus Arbitrase dalam sengketa pembatalan putusan arbitrase Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI), Mahkamah Agung telah menerima permohonan pembatalan putusan arbitrase BANI yang didasarkan pada alasan yang sebenarnya tidak termasuk dalam unsur-unsur sebagaimana dimaksud pada Pasal 70 UU No. 30 Tahun 1999. Majelis Hakim pada Mahkamah Agung juga memberikan putusan yang justru di luar konteks pembatalan putusan arbitrase, bahkan di luar dari permohonan yang diminta oleh para pihak dan disinyalir mengandung ultra petita. Mahkamah Agung melalui putusannya tersebut justru di satu sisi telah mengabulkan permohonan kasasi dari PT Berkah Karya Bersama yang keberatan dengan pembatalan putusan BANI tersebut, namun di sisi lain justru menyatakan bahwa putusan tersebut tidak dapat dilaksanakan (non-executable). Secara yuridis, putusan arbitrase pada dasarnya bersifat final and binding, sehingga putusan arbitrase tersebut seharusnya menjadi satu-satunya putusan yang menyelesaikan sengketa para pihak. Adapun upaya pembatalan terhadap putusan arbitrase, seharusnya didasarkan pada ketentuan yang pasti serta keseragaman pemahaman khususnya menganai alasan-alasan pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Kondisi ini dapat menjadikan upaya pembatalan terhadap putusan arbitrase ini sebagai celah bagi pihak-pihak yang merasa tidak puas dengan putusan tersebut untuk menunda pelaksanaan putusan arbitarse. Dengan demikian, penyelesaian perkara melalui arbitrase, yang salah satu kelebihannya untuk menyelesaikan sengketa secara cepat dan efektif, justru akan memberikan preseden buruk dengan adanya upaya pembatalan yang tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku / The provisions regarding the annulment of the arbitral award in Indonesia are regulated in Article 70 of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. The Article in limited sets any reasons that can be relied upon by the parties to apply for the annulment of an arbitration award. In the Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia (MARI) No. 97 B/ Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016 on civil lawsuit of arbitration in the dispute of annulment of arbitral award of Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI), the Supreme Court has granted the application of annulment of BANI award based on reasons that are not included in the elements as referred to in Article 70 of Law No. 30 of 1999. The Panel of Judges at the Supreme Court also provides the decision that is outside the context of the annulment of the arbitral award, even it allegedly contains ultra petita. The Supreme Court through its decision has granted the cassation of PT Berkah Karya Bersama that objected to the annulment of the BANI decision, but on the other hand it states that the decision could not be implemented (non-executable). Legally, the arbitral award is essentially final and binding, so that the arbitral award should be the only decision to resolve the dispute between the parties. The efforts of the annulment of the arbitral award, should be based on the provisions of a definite and uniform understanding especially on reasons of annulment of the arbitral award. This condition can make efforts to annulment of the arbitral award is a gap for those who are not satisfied with the decision to postpone the implementation of the arbitral award. Thus, settling disputes through arbitration, which is one of its advantages to resolve disputes quickly and effectively, it will give a bad precedent by the effort annulment does not comply with the prevailing laws and regulations

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
Manurung, Bobby ChristiantoUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
ContributorBudi, Henry SoelistyoUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Law
Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Law
Depositing User: Ms Devy Christiany Zega
Date Deposited: 05 Apr 2019 03:21
Last Modified: 05 Apr 2019 03:21
URI: http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/2810

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item