Perbandingan instruksi pembelajaran insidental dan intensional pada pemerolehan kosakata bahasa kedua melalui kegiatan membaca

Chotimah, Chusnul (2016) Perbandingan instruksi pembelajaran insidental dan intensional pada pemerolehan kosakata bahasa kedua melalui kegiatan membaca. Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

[img] Text (Title)
Title.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (24MB)
[img] Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (364kB)
[img] Text (ToC)
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (350kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 1)
Chapter 1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (377kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 2)
Chapter 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (702kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 3)
Chapter 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (595kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 4)
Chapter 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (594kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 5)
Chapter 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (370kB)
[img] Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (405kB)
[img] Text (Appendices)
Appendices.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (11MB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini menyelidiki pengaruh instruksi pembelajaran incidental dan intensional pada pemerolehan kosakata pada siswa kelas tiga Sekolah Cikal lewat kegiatan membaca. Desain penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif, eksperimental, static- group pretest-posttest. Sebagai subyek penelitian, 48 siswa dibagi ke dalam kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok control. Kelompok eksperimen menerima perlakuan instruksi pembelajaran incidental melalui kegiatan membaca dengan menggunakan strategi literature circle. Kelompok control menerima perlakuan instruksi intensional melalui kegiatan membaca dengan menggunakan strategi vocabulary self-collection. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah vocabulary levels test dan vocabulary test. Validitas instrumen penelitian diperiksa oleh dua ahli, dicoba kepada 12 siswa kelas 3 dan reliabilitasnya diperiksa dengan menggunakan Cronbach Alpha. Peneliti menganalisa data dengan menggunakan statistic deskriptif, Paired Samples T-test, dan N-gain. Siswa penerima perlakuan instruksi insidental menunjukkan capaian sedikit lebih tinggi daripada siswa penerima perlakuan instruksi intensional dari 0.43 untuk kelompuk eksperimen dan 0.16 untuk kelompok kontrol dari 20 pertanyaan yang diajukan. Perbandingan rata-rata yang ditunjukkan pada studi ini tidak menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan antara instruksi incidental dan intensional yang ditunjukkan oleh pemerolehan skor N-gain sejumlah 0.26 / This study investigated the impact of incidental and intentional vocabulary instruction on Grade Three student’s vocabulary learning. The study employed quantitative, experimental of static-group pretest and posttest. The research subjects were 48 students. The experimental group received incidental learning instruction by reading through literature circle activity. The control group received intentional learning instruction by reading and vocabulary self-collection strategy. The instruments used in this study were vocabulary levels test and vocabulary test. The validity of the instruments checked by two experts, tried out to 12 grade 3 students and the reliability was checked using Cronbach Alpha. The researcher analyzed the data through descriptive statistics, Paired Samples T-test, and N-gain. The students with incidental learning instruction performed slightly higher than students who received intentional vocabulary instruction from 0.43 and 0.16 out of 20 questions respectively. The mean comparison exhibited that there was not significant difference between incidental learning instruction and intentional vocabulary learning instruction as the N-gain score showed 0.26

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
Chotimah, ChusnulNIM00000013786UNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorHananto, HanantoNIDN0303066202UNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywords: Insidental ; Intensional ; Instruksi ; Pembelajaran Kosakata ; Membaca ; Incidental ; Intentional ; Instruction ; Vocabulary Learning ; Reading
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1028.3 Educational techology
Divisions: University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Education > Master of Educational Technology
Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Education > Master of Educational Technology
Depositing User: Ms Devy Christiany Zega
Date Deposited: 06 Aug 2019 05:43
Last Modified: 03 Nov 2021 04:05
URI: http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/4165

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item