Penuntutan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pencucian uang yang bersumber dari hasil tindak pidana narkotika (studi putusan MA No.1869K/PID.SUS/2020)

Wibowo, Enrico (2021) Penuntutan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pencucian uang yang bersumber dari hasil tindak pidana narkotika (studi putusan MA No.1869K/PID.SUS/2020). Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) Title.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (694kB)
Preview	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (360kB) | Preview
	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
Preview	Text (Chapter1) Chapter1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter2) Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (Chapter3) Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (449kB)
	Text (Chapter4) Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (3MB)
	Text (Chapter5) Chapter5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (445kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (358kB) | Preview
	Text (Appendices) Appendices.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (2MB)

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan memahami pelaksanaan penuntutan yang dilakukan oleh jaksa penuntut umum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pencucian uang yang bersumber dari hasil tindak pidana narkotika selain itu untuk mengkaji dan memahami pertimbangan hakim Mahkamah Agung dalam menjatuhkan putusan nomor 1869K/Pid.Sus/2020. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif-empiris yakni mengkaji pelaksaan penuntutan jaksa penuntut umum dan pertimbangan hakim agung dalam menjatuhkan putusan secara faktual. Penulisan ini menggunakan data sekunder, yang bersumber dari peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana sebagai bahan hukum primer. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara penelitian kepustakaan (library research). Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (statue approach), pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Analisa data dilakukan secara normatif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian yaitu jaksa penuntut umum dalam pelaksanaan penuntutannya terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pencucian uang yang bersumber dari hasil tindak pidana narkotika berpedoman pada Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jaksa penuntut umum dalam melaksanakan penuntutan terlebih dahulu menyusun berkas perkara untuk dilimpahkan ke Pengadilan Negeri, kemudian jaksa penuntut umum menyiapkan surat dakwaan, surat tuntutan serta menghadirkan barang bukti dan saksi-saksi. Majelis hakim akan melakukan musyawarah sebelum menjatuhkan putusan. Putusan MA No.1869K/Pid.Sus/2020, majelis hakim Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan kasasi dari penuntut umum perihal barang bukti berupa 1 (satu) unit rumah yang menjadi dirampas untuk Negara karena dalam pertimbangan hukumnya majelis hakim Mahkamah Agung menilai putusan tersebut memenuhi rasa keadilan dan memberi efek jera terhadap pelaku. Untuk aparat penegak hukum khususnya jaksa penuntut umum hendaknya dapat meningkatkan kualitas dakwaan, dan kepada hakim Pengadilan Negeri maupun Pengadilan Tinggi harus lebih jeli dalam memutus perkara./ The purpose of this research is to study and understand the implementation of prosecutions conducted by the public prosecutor against perpetrators of money laundering crimes stemming from the proceeds of narcotics crimes in addition to studying and understanding the consideration of Supreme Court judges in dropping the verdict number 1869K/Pid.Sus/2020. The type of research used is normative-empirical, namely reviewing the prosecution of prosecutors and consideration of supreme court justices in dropping the verdict factually. This paper uses secondary data, which is sourced from the legislation and the Criminal Procedure Law As the primary legal material. Data collection techniques are done by means of library research. The research approach uses the statue approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Data analysis is conducted in qualitative normative. The result of the study is the public prosecutor in the implementation of his prosecution of the perpetrators of money laundering crimes stemming from the results of narcotics crimes guided by the Criminal Procedure Law and Law No. 8 of 2010 on prevention and eradication of money laundering crimes. The public prosecutor in carrying out the prosecution in advance compiled the case file to be handed over to the District Court, then the public prosecutor prepares an indictment, a letter of claim and presents evidence and witnesses. The panel of judges will conduct deliberations before handing down the verdict. Decision no.1869K/Pid.Sus/2020, then the public prosecutor prepares an indictment, a letter of claim and presents evidence and witnesses. the Supreme Court judges granted the cassation of the public prosecutor regarding evidence in the form of 1 (one) unit of the house that became seized for the State because in its legal considerations the Supreme Court judged the verdict to meet the sense of justice and give a deterrent effect to the perpetrators. For law enforcement officials, especially prosecutors, should be able to improve the quality of the indictment, and to the judges of the District Court and the High Court should be more observant in deciding the case.

Actions (login required)

View Item