Analisis yuridis terhadap pembagian harta bersama akibat perceraian (Pendekatan Kasus: Putusan Nomor 539/Pdt.G/2014/PN.JKT.PST) = Judicial analysis regarding joint property division in the event of divorce (Case study: Decision number 539/Pdt.G/2014/PN.JKT.PST)

Chandra, Priska Febriana (2017) Analisis yuridis terhadap pembagian harta bersama akibat perceraian (Pendekatan Kasus: Putusan Nomor 539/Pdt.G/2014/PN.JKT.PST) = Judicial analysis regarding joint property division in the event of divorce (Case study: Decision number 539/Pdt.G/2014/PN.JKT.PST). Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

[img] Text (Title)
Title.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)
[img] Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (336kB)
[img] Text (ToC)
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (589kB)
[img] Text (Chapter1)
Chapter1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (446kB)
[img] Text (Chapter2)
Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (451kB)
[img] Text (Chapter3)
Chapter3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (393kB)
[img] Text (Chapter4)
Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (417kB)
[img] Text (Chapter5)
Chapter5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (310kB)
[img] Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (361kB)
[img] Text (Appendices)
Appendices.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (668kB)
[img] Text (Publication Agreement)
Publication-Agreement.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Every human being is a social creature that always do interaction with other humans, this contact has been made since born until die. The example of this interaction is a marriage between a man and a woman, marriage is a personal, physical, psychological, emotional and spiritual bond between a man and a woman to form a family. The purpose of marriage is to have a happy prosperous family, to reach that between husband and wife needs to help and complete each other, so that both of husband and wife can develop their personality to help them to reach happy prosperous family. However, the marriage not always goes well and sometimes ends up by divorce. Divorce seems to be the best solution to resolve domestic conflict. Unfortunately divorce still leaving problem, one of the example is the separation of marital property. Marital property is a property that both of husband and wife get when the marriage occurred, but this does not rule out the possibility of separation property when they have made about separation property when divorce happens. If they haven’t made agreement for separation property, then when divorce happens the property will be divided to both equitably. However, in the reality the separation for the marital property for both husband and wife often occurred unfairness in separation the martial property so that became a problem for one from either husband or wife. The unfairness problem from the separation martial property can be settled in court. They can hope the judge to give them fair amount in the final court decisions. This essay is to analyze how the judge can apply the law to the verdict No.539/Pdt.G/2014/PN.JKT.PST, but according to author analysis, this final court decision not yet provide a fair amount to both ex husband and ex wife. This issue is not accordance with Article 128 of the Indonesia Civil Code and the Supreme Court of Indonesia Jurisprudence No.1448K/Sip/1974.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelor)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
Chandra, Priska FebrianaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorSari, Vicensia Esti PurnamaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Additional Information: SK 51-13 CHA a
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Law
Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Law
Depositing User: Users 6 not found.
Date Deposited: 17 Aug 2018 04:39
Last Modified: 18 Aug 2021 08:13
URI: http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/428

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item