Analisis yuridis putusan majelis pengawas pusat notaris di luar batas kewenangannya (studi kasus).

Naro, Dora Rosalina (2019) Analisis yuridis putusan majelis pengawas pusat notaris di luar batas kewenangannya (studi kasus). Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

[img] Text (Title)
Title.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (963kB)
[img] Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (167kB)
[img] Text (ToC)
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (323kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 1)
Chapter 1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (266kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 2)
Chapter 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (460kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 3)
Chapter 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (336kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 4)
Chapter 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (338kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 5)
Chapter 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (239kB)
[img] Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (200kB)

Abstract

Notaris dalam melaksanakan jabatannya diawasi dan dibina oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris yang terdiri dari Majelis Pengawas Daerah, Majelis Pengawas Wilayah dan Majelis Pengawas Pusat, diangkat oleh Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Majelis Pengawas Notaris memiliki wewenang dan kewajiban yang diatur dalam UUJN, Peraturan dan Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Permasalahan pada penelitian ini adalah apakah tindakan dan Putusan Majelis Pengawas Pusat No. 11 Tahun 2010 telah sesuai dengan kewenangannya yang diatur dalam UUJN dan Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia? Apakah penerapan Putusan Majelis Pengawas Pusat No. No. 11 Tahun 2010 yang diajukan sebagai Objek Gugatan dalam Perkara No. 43/G/2011/PTUN-JKT sudah tepat? Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah tipe penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan peraturan lainnya. Hasil penelitian berkesimpulan pertama bahwa Majelis Pengawas Pusat telah bertindak dan mengeluarkan putusan di luar kewenangannya. Kedua pengajuan gugatan dari Notaris terhadap Majelis Pengawas Pusat ke PTUN tidak tepat, karena tidak sesuai dengan Undang-Undang No 51 Tahun 2009 Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang No 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara / The notary in carrying out his position is supervised and nurtured by the Notary Supervisory Board consisting of the Regional Supervisory Board, the Regional Supervisory Board and the Central Supervisory Board, appointed by the Minister of Law and Human Rights. The Notary Supervisory Board has the authority and obligations which is stipulated in the UUJN, the Regulations and Decrees of the Minister of Law and Human Rights. The problem in this case study is whether the actions and decisions of the Central Supervisory Board No. 11 of 2010 has been in accordance with the authority which are stipulated in UUJN and Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights? Does the application of the Decision of the Central Supervisory Board No. No. 11 of 2010 which was submitted as the Object of the Claim in Case No. 43/G/2011/PTUN-JKT appropriate? The type of research which is used on this case study is normative legal research with a statute approach and other regulations. The results of the study conclude that, first, the Central Supervisory Board has acted and issued a decision outside of its authority. Second, the filing of a lawsuit from a Notary to the Central Supervisory Board to the Administrative Court was inappropriate, because it was not in accordance with Law No. 51 of 2009 as Second Amendment to Law No. 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
Naro, Dora RosalinaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorSusantijo, SusiUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywords: Decision of the Central Supervisory Board ; Outside the Authority ; PTUN ; Decision of the Central Supervisory Board ; Outside of its Authority ; PTUN
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary
Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary
Depositing User: Ms Devy Christiany Zega
Date Deposited: 07 Nov 2019 06:25
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2019 06:25
URI: http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/5190

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item