Perlindungan notaris sebagai saksi dalam tindak pidana korupsi di komisi pemberatasan korupsi

Jamin, Jamin (2016) Perlindungan notaris sebagai saksi dalam tindak pidana korupsi di komisi pemberatasan korupsi. Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

[img] Text (Title)
Title (1)_watermark (1).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (984kB)
[img] Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (276kB)
[img] Text (ToC)
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (289kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 1)
Chapter 1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (323kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 2)
Chapter 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (416kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 3)
Chapter 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (285kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 4)
Chapter 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (463kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 5)
Chapter 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (268kB)
[img] Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (266kB)
[img] Text (Appendices)
Appendices.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (5MB)

Abstract

Notaris yang merupakan pejabat umum dalam menjalankan jabatannya sering sekali diperiksa sebagai saksi baik dalam perkara perdata, pidana maupun perkara tata usaha negara, atau bahkan menjadi tersangka dalam perkara tindak pidana, dalam ketentuan Pasal 66 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris disyaratkan bahwa untuk kepentingan peradilan penyidik berwenang untuk memanggil notaris untuk memberikan fotocopy minuta akta dan memberikan keterangan sehubungan dengan akta yang dibuatnya ini berarti dalam seluruh tindak pidana bila notaris dipanggil maka wajib mendapatkan persetujuan oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris, tetapi dalam ketentuan tindak pidana korupsi, Pasal 46 Undang-Undang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi No. 30 Tahun 2002, menegaskan bahwa ketentuan hukum lain tidak berlaku dalam hal Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi telah menetapkan sebagai terdakwa dengan undang-undang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi tersebut, menurut penulis ketentuan Pasal 46 Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana korupsi tersebut tidak serta merta mengesampingkan pemanggilan notaris sebagai saksi tetapi hanya jika notaris sebagai tersangka maka tidak memerlukan persetujuan dari Majelis Kehormatan Notaris karena mengesampikan Pasal 66 ayat ayat 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris sedangkan jika seseorang diminta penyidik Komisi Pembertasan Korupsi sebagai saksi tetap harus mendapatkan persetujuan dari Majelis Kehormatan Notaris sehingga jika notaris memberikan keterangan di hadapan penyidik Komisi Pembertasan Korupsi tanpa pesertujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris, maka Notaris tersebut berhak menolak untuk memberikan keterangan dan Majelis Kehormatan harus melindungi Notaris tersebut, tetapi jika notaris secara sukarela datang sendiri tanpa pesertujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris, jika ada gugatan terhadap notaris tersebut maka Mejelis Kehormatan Notaris tidak dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris tersebut /Notary as a public official on their authority usually be taken to the court as a witness on criminal or civil case or also state administration dispute or even become a suspect on criminal case. Article 66 (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 about Amendment of Law Number 30 of 2004 on Office of Notary Public, stated for court interest, Police Investigator have an authority to summon the Notary for giving the Investigator a copy of Minute of Deed and any legal information. It mean every criminal case when Notary being summoned, the Investigator have to grant approval from District/Municipal Supervisory Council. On the other regulation, as stated article 46 on Corruption Eradication Commission Law Number 30 of 2002, other Law was dismissed when Corruption Eradication Commission already determined a suspect with Corruption Eradication Commission Law. Author in accordance with Article 46 of Corruption Criminal law was not withdrawing Notary summoning as a witness but only when the Notary is a suspect and the District/Municipal Supervisory Council Approval is not necessary because ignoring Article 66 point 1 of Law Number 2 of 2014 about amendment of Law number 30 of 2004 on Office of Notary Public, but if a Notary being asked by Corruption Eradication Commission Investigator as a witness still have to grant approval of District/Municipal Supervisory Council. If a Notary being investigated without approval from District/Municipal Supervisory Council, the Notary have a right to refuse to giving a legal information and District/Municipal Supervisory Council have an obligation to protect the Notary. If the Notary come to the investigator voluntary without District/Municipal Supervisory Council permission, a lawsuit to him as a Notary will not have a legal protection from District/Municipal Supervisory Council. Approval from District/Municipal Supervisory Council for witness Request from Corruption Eradication Commission Investigator practically often happen. This situation happening because the Question list for the Notary as a witness never asked about the approval from District/Municipal Supervisory Council. This approval is crucial for legal transparency and not because of threat to the Notary when giving a legal information in front of Corruption Eradication Commission Investigator

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
Jamin, JaminNIM01656170118UNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorBudianto, AgusNIDN0326067304UNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywords: Notary Public ; Notary Honorary Council ; Corruption Eradication Commission ; Notary; District / Municipal Supervisory Council ; Corruption Eradication Commission
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary
Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary
Depositing User: Ms Devy Christiany Zega
Date Deposited: 07 Nov 2019 04:47
Last Modified: 28 Nov 2020 06:19
URI: http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/5310

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item