Upaya hukum terhadap putusan majelis pengawas notaris yang tidak sejalan dengan prinsip keadilan para pihak (studi kasus putusan majelis pengawas pusat notaris nomor: 08/b/mppn/xi/2018)

Timothy, Jonathan (2019) Upaya hukum terhadap putusan majelis pengawas notaris yang tidak sejalan dengan prinsip keadilan para pihak (studi kasus putusan majelis pengawas pusat notaris nomor: 08/b/mppn/xi/2018). Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

[img] Text (Title)
Title.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (4MB)
[img] Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (209kB)
[img] Text (ToC)
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (250kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 1)
Chapter 1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (303kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 2)
Chapter 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (394kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 3)
Chapter 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (217kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 4)
Chapter 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (357kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 5)
Chapter 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (252kB)
[img] Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (298kB)

Abstract

Tesis ini membahas upaya hukum terhadap putusan Majelis Pengawas Notaris yang tidak sejalan dengan prinsip keadilan, yaitu upaya-upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh seorang pelapor dan terlapor dalam hal tidak menerima hasil putusan dari Majelis Pengawas Pusat karena merasa tidak adanya keadilan dalam surat putusan yang diputuskan oleh Majelis Pengawas Pusat Notaris. Permasalahan yang dibahas adalah sebagaima faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi putusan Majelis Pengawas Notaris sebagai hakim sehingga dirasa tidak sejalan dengan prinsip keadilan dan upaya-upaya hukum apa saja yang dapat diajukan terhadap putusan Majelis Pengawas Pusat sebagai lembaga tertinggi yang berwenang memeriksa kasus jabatan Notaris. Penulisan yang dilakukan penulis dalam tesis ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach). Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder didukung dengan data primer, data sekunder yang diperoleh dari bahan-bahan kepustakaan data primer diperoleh melalui wawacara.. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif yang menghasilkan deskriptif analisis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menjelaskan adanya faktor-faktor pemikiran Majelis Pengawas Pusat dalam memutus sebuah kasus pelanggaran Jabatan Notaris sehingga putusan yang dikeluarkannya terlihat memihak dan tidak adil, serta adanya upaya-upaya yang dapat dilakukan terhadap putusan Majelis Pengawas Pusat Notaris berdasarkan Pasal 35 ayat (2) Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM RI nomor M.02.PR.08.10 Tahun 2004, yang menyatakan Putusan Majelis Pengawas Pusat Notaris belum final dan dapat dilakukan upaya-upaya hukum lainnya / This thesis is a discussion of legal remedies against the verdict of the Notary Supervisory Board which is not in line with the principle of justice, namely the efforts that can be carried out by a reporter and the reported in the terms of refuse the decision from the Central Supervisory Board because they feel there is no justice in the verdict decided by the Notary Central Supervisory Board. The issues discussed are as factors that influence the decision of the Notary Supervisory Board as a judge so that it is deemed not in line with the principles of justice and any legal measures that can be submitted against the decision of the Central Supervisory Board as the highest institution authorized to examine the case of Notary. This thesis is normative legal research with a statute approach. The data used is secondary data supported by primary data, secondary data obtained from the primary data library materials obtained through interview. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively which resulted in descriptive analysis. Based on the results of the study, there are factors of thought which drive the Central Supervisory Board in deciding a case of violation of the Notary Position so that the decision issued by them look impartial and unfair, and there are efforts that can be made against the decision of the Notary Central Supervisory Board based on Article 35 paragraph (2) Republic of Indonesia Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation number M.02.PR.08.10 of 2004, which states that the Decision of the Notary Center Supervisory Board is not final and other legal measures can be taken

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
Timothy, JonathanUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorBudianto, AgusUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywords: Notary Public ; Legal effort ; Public Notary ; Legal Remedies
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary
Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary
Depositing User: Ms Devy Christiany Zega
Date Deposited: 07 Nov 2019 04:48
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2019 04:48
URI: http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/5312

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item