Analisa yuridis pelaksanaan pengembalian modal yang telah disetor dalam perseroan berdasarkan putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (studi kasus putusan mahkamah agung nomor: 2075k/pdt/2017.jo.no.494/pdt.g/2015/ pn.jkt.brt)

Witasari, Prastiwi (2019) Analisa yuridis pelaksanaan pengembalian modal yang telah disetor dalam perseroan berdasarkan putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (studi kasus putusan mahkamah agung nomor: 2075k/pdt/2017.jo.no.494/pdt.g/2015/ pn.jkt.brt). Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

[img] Text (Title)
Title.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (1MB)
[img] Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (195kB)
[img] Text (ToC)
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (295kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 1)
Chapter 1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (332kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 2)
Chapter 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (547kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 3)
Chapter 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (334kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 4)
Chapter 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (547kB)
[img] Text (Chapter 5)
Chapter 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (201kB)
[img] Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (203kB)
[img] Text (Appendices)
Appendices.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (431kB)

Abstract

Penyertaan modal merupakan bentuk sumber dana bagi perseroan, Penyertaan modal dalam perseroan hanya sebatas modal yang disetor dan sesuai dengan kentuan Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) Dalam hal ini menimbulkan kerancuan bagi investor mengenai status hukum mereka yang harus tunduk pada ketentuan UUPT sebagaimana dapat dilihat dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor:2075K/PDT/2017.Jo.No.494/PDT.G/2015/PN.JKT.BRT)yang diajukan oleh Ny. Jessicha selaku investor kepada Tuan Boy Hartono/Tergugat I dan PT. Maxindo Artha Prima/Tergugat II. Putusan memerintahkan para tergugat untuk mengembalikan uang yang telah disetor oleh Ny. Jessicha dan oleh karenya penulis bermaksud menganalisa status penyertaan modal dalam perseroan. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian normatif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder didukung dengan data primer, data sekunder yang diperoleh dari bahan-bahan kepustakaan berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Jenis pendekatan yang digunakan adalah undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis maka diketahui bahwa kerjasama Ny.Jessicha tersebut tunduk kepada pengaturan dalam UUPT. Meskipun anggaran dasar merupakan perwujudan perjanjian diantara pemegang saham, namun kerjasama tersebut tidak semata-mata mengacu kepada Pasal 1338 KUHPer tentang kebebasan berkontrak, namun juga mengacu kepada UUPT. Pengembalian penyetoran modal yang telah terkonversi menjadi saham dapat dilakukan dengan beberapa cara sesuai ketentuan UUPT yakni pemindahan hak atas saham, pembelian kembali atas saham oleh Perseroan dan pengurangan modal Perseroan. Sedangkan kelebihan jumlah setoran yang tercatat sebagai hutang Perseroan kepada Ny. Jessicha atau setoran awal pemegang saham cukup dikembalikan tanpa mekanisme atau persetujuan RUPS. Sedangkan terhadap pengembalian penyetoran modal yang telah terkonversi menjadi saham dilakukan dengan beberapa cara sesuai dengan ketentuan UUPT yakni pemindahan hak atas saham, pembelian kembali atas saham oleh Perseroan dan pengurangan modal Perseroan. Sedangkan kelebihan jumlah setoran tersebut di atas yang tercatat sebagai hutang Perseroan kepada Ny. Jessicha atau setoran awal pemegang saham cukup langsung dikembalikan / Equity participation is a form of funding for the company, capital participation in the company is limited to paid-in capital and in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UUPT) In this case it creates confusion for investors regarding their legal status which must be subject to the provisions of the Company Law as can be seen in the Decision of the Supreme Court Number: 2075K / PDT / 2017.Jo. No.494 / PDT.G / 2015 / PN.JKT.BRT) submitted by Ny. Jessicha as an investor to Mr. Boy Hartono / Defendant I and PT. Maxindo Artha Prima / Tergugat II based on the results of the General Meeting of Shareholders regarding the permanent benefits for shareholders. In the decision ordered the defendants to return the money paid by Ny. Jessicha and therefore the author intends to analyze the status of equity participation in the company. The author uses normative research methods. The data used are secondary data supported by primary data, secondary data obtained from library materials in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The type of approach used is the law and case approach. Based on the results of research conducted by the author, it is known that the partnership of Ny. Jessicha is subject to the regulation in the Company Law and the Company's articles of association. Although the articles of association constitute the embodiment of the agreement between shareholders, the cooperation does not merely refer to Article 1338 of the Criminal Code concerning freedom of contract, but also refers to the Company Law. Returns of deposits of capital that have been converted into shares can be done in several ways in accordance with the provisions of the Company Law, namely the transfer of rights to shares, repurchase of shares by the Company and reduction of the Company's capital. While the excess amount of the deposit mentioned above is recorded as the Company's debt to Ny. Jessicha or the initial shareholders' deposit is immediately returned without the mechanism or approval of the GMS. Whereas for the return of deposits of capital that have been converted into shares can be done in several ways in accordance with the provisions of the Company Law, namely the transfer of rights to shares, repurchase of shares by the Company and reduction of the Company's capital. While the excess amount of the deposit mentioned above is recorded as the Company's debt to Ny. Jessicha or the initial shareholders' deposit is immediately returned without the mechanism or approval of the GMS

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
Witasari, PrastiwiNIM01656170054UNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorSusantijo, SusiNIDN0319106201UNSPECIFIED
Additional Information: T 56-17 WIT a
Uncontrolled Keywords: Equity capital ; Limited company ; Equity Participation ; Limited Liability Company
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary
Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary
Depositing User: Users 18 not found.
Date Deposited: 07 Nov 2019 04:25
Last Modified: 10 Jan 2022 03:46
URI: http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/5384

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item