Pembuktian sederhana penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang (PKPU) oleh Tommy B.W, S.H & Hasan terhadap PT Sawit Inti Prima Perkasa (studi putusan nomor 7/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan & putusan nomor 8/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan)

Chandra, Catherine Aureulli (2022) Pembuktian sederhana penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang (PKPU) oleh Tommy B.W, S.H & Hasan terhadap PT Sawit Inti Prima Perkasa (studi putusan nomor 7/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan & putusan nomor 8/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan). Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

Preview	Text (Title) Title.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (31kB) | Preview
	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (282kB)
	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (655kB)
	Text (Chapter1) Chapter1.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (Chapter2) Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (2MB)
	Text (Chapter3) Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (553kB)
	Text (Chapter4) Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (5MB)
	Text (Chapter5) Chapter5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (370kB)
	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (436kB)
	Text (Appendices) Appendices.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (23MB)

Abstract

This study aims to examine the PKPU Decision through the Study of Decision Number 7/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga & Decision Number 8/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan. The second objective is to examine the debt comparison and the implementation of creditors in applying for PKPU against their debtors, the debtor's responsibility to creditors when the PKPU application is granted, and the consideration of the Panel of Judges in giving decisions that are guided by Law Number 37 of 2004. This study uses normative legal research methods by examining court ruling as primary material in conducting research along with laws and regulations, books, documents, journals and scientific works as secondary material and reliable news as tertiary material. The analysis technique used is a qualitative method where data analysis is carried out through a literature study. The results of the research and research analysis obtained are that the debtor of PT Sawit Inti Prima Perkasa has debts to Creditors Tommy and Hasan which is proven through 'Summary Proof' as regulated in Article 8 paragraph (4) of the PKPU Law and the existence of 'Confessions of Debt' by the debtor. In practice, the Panel of Judges rejected Decision Number 7/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga and allowed the parties to settle disputes through the District Court in accordance with the agreement of the parties in the Cooperation Agreement, while the Panel of Judges granted Decision Number 8/Pdt.Sus -PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan so that the debtor of PT Sawit Inti Prima Perkasa is responsible for submitting the peace proposal to creditors Hasan and creditors Tommy B.W, S.H. If the reconciliation proposal is approved by the creditors, the results of the peace agreement will be homologated by the Commercial Court, which is legally binding for Hasan and Tommy's creditors with PT SIPP's debtors. The discrepancy in the results of the PKPU application between the two decisions causes inconsistency in the application of the law carried out by the Panel of Judges, this hampers the achievement of legal certainty sought by creditors or debtors in Bankruptcy and PKPU Practices./Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji Putusan PKPU melalui Studi Putusan Nomor 7/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga & Putusan Nomor 8/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan. Tujuan kedua ialah mengkaji perbandingan utang dan pelaksanaan kreditor dalam mengajukan PKPU terhadap debitornya, pertanggungjawaban debitor kepada kreditor ketika permohonan PKPU dikabulkan, serta pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam memberikan putusan yang berpedoman kepada Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan meneliti putusan pengadilan sebagai bahan primer dalam melakukan penelitian beserta peraturan perundang-undangan, buku, dokumen, jurnal dan karya ilmiah sebagai bahan sekunder dan berita terpercaya sebagai bahan tersier. Teknik Analisa yang digunakan adalah dengan metode kualitatif dimana analisa data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian dan analisis penelitian yang diperoleh ialah Debitor PT Sawit Inti Prima Perkasa mempunyai utang kepada Kreditor Tommy dan Hasan dimana dibuktikan melalui ‘Pembuktian Sederhana’ yang diatur dalam Pasal 8 ayat (4) UUK PKPU dan adanya ‘Pengakuan Utang’ oleh debitor. Praktiknya, Majelis Hakim menolak Putusan Nomor 7/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga dan mempersilahkan para pihak untuk melakukan penyelesaikan sengketa melalui Pengadilan Negeri sesuai dengan kesepakatan para pihak dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama, sedangkan Majelis Hakim mengabulkan Putusan Nomor 8/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Niaga Medan sehingga Debitor PT Sawit Inti Prima Perkasa bertanggung jawab atas pengajuan proposal perdamaian kepada kreditor Hasan dan kreditor Tommy B.W, S.H. Apabila proposal perdamaian disetujui oleh para kreditor, maka hasil persetujuan perdamaian akan dihomologasikan oleh Pengadilan Niaga yang mengikat secara hukum bagi kreditor Hasan dan kreditor Tommy dengan debitor PT SIPP. Ketimpangan hasil permohonan pengajuan PKPU antara kedua putusan tersebut menyebabkan inkonsistensi penerapan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Majelis Hakim, hal ini menghambat pencapaian kepastian hukum yang dicari oleh kreditor ataupun debitor dalam Praktik Kepailitan dan PKPU.

Actions (login required)

View Item