Aspek hukum penggunaan lambang garuda ditinjau dari Undang-undang no. 24 tahun 2009 tentang bendera, bahasa dan lambang negara serta lagu kebangsaan dan undang-undang no. 19 tahun 2002 tentang hak cipta = Legal aspects of the use of garuda emblem based on review from law no. 24 of year 2009 about the flag, emblem and the national language and song and law no. 19 of year 2002 on copyright

Khashoggi, Khashoggi (2012) Aspek hukum penggunaan lambang garuda ditinjau dari Undang-undang no. 24 tahun 2009 tentang bendera, bahasa dan lambang negara serta lagu kebangsaan dan undang-undang no. 19 tahun 2002 tentang hak cipta = Legal aspects of the use of garuda emblem based on review from law no. 24 of year 2009 about the flag, emblem and the national language and song and law no. 19 of year 2002 on copyright. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

[img] Text (Title)
Title.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (7MB)
[img] Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (84kB)
[img] Text (ToC)
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (98kB)
[img] Text (Chapter1)
Chapter1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (168kB)
[img] Text (Chapter2)
Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (238kB)
[img] Text (Chapter3)
Chapter3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (150kB)
[img] Text (Chapter4)
Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (234kB)
[img] Text (Chapter5)
Chapter5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (123kB)
[img] Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (131kB)
[img] Text (Appendices)
Appendices.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (17MB)
[img] Text (Publication-Agreement)
Publication-Agreement.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (602kB)

Abstract

In the study of Law, knowing and understanding just the theory is not enough, we have to also study and understand more on the practice of the law case. One case that we’re going to observe: Lawsuit against David Tobing for the mis-use of National Soccer Team uniform. From this case we learn that: First: The outcome of the lawsuit is not always as expected by the Plaintiff. David Tobing’s case cannot be accepted (niet ontvankelijke werklaard) by the presiding Judge of National Court of Central Jakarta. It was decided that The Plaintiff did not notify the Defendant in advance as that was the main requirement in Citizen Law Suit (CLS). One of the consequences is that the case cannot be pursue anymore, and that the case is not clear and has no end. Second: The case of David Tobing also shown its other side, namely the existence of two regimes that can be used as a legal basis approach, they are: Law no. 24 year 2009 on our National Flag, Language, Emblem and National Anthem and also Law no. 19 of year 2002 on Copyright. Supposedly, the two regimes can be used in settlement of the dispute, but in reality only Law no. 29 year 2009 on our National Flag, Language, Emblem and National Anthem that can be the basis of David Tobing’s lawsuit. This happen because the law has set the standard procedures and sanctions of the use of the National Emblem with all its limitations, while the Law no. 19 of 2002 on Copyrights set the National Emblem use in general, thus it cannot accommodate the lawsuit of David Tobing.

Item Type: Thesis (Bachelor)
Creators:
CreatorsNIMEmail
Khashoggi, KhashoggiNIM05120089103UNSPECIFIED
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorBudi, Henry SoelistyoUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Thesis advisorPangadaran, SatryaNIDN0308108401UNSPECIFIED
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Law
Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Law
Depositing User: Users 13 not found.
Date Deposited: 04 Oct 2018 05:43
Last Modified: 13 Oct 2020 05:15
URI: http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/592

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item