Analisis putusan Mahkamah Agung no.162/PK/PDT.SUS/2010 tentang sengketa merek

Sidarta, Roy Sutrisno (2018) Analisis putusan Mahkamah Agung no.162/PK/PDT.SUS/2010 tentang sengketa merek. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title.pdf) SAMPUL.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
Preview	Text (Abstract.pdf) ABSTRACT.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (28kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter1.pdf) Bab-1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (134kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter2.pdf) Bab-2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (308kB)
	Text (Chapter3.pdf) Bab-3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (209kB)
	Text (Chapter4.pdf) Bab-4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (39kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography.pdf) PUSTAKA.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (21kB) | Preview

Abstract

Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 162 PK/PDT.SUS/2010 menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum karena aturan yang terdapat dalam Undang-Undang Merek Pasal 3 memberikan hak eksklusif bagi merek yang melakukan pendafatran. Tetapi sangat bertolak belakang dengan kenyataan yang timbul, bahwa PT. Manggala Putra Perkasa pemilik merek Polo Ralph Laurent tidak dilindungi merek yang dimilikinya. Sehingga harus dikalahkan oleh PT. Primajaya Pantes Garment adalah perusahaan yang memiliki merek Polo. Gambar logo yang dimiliki kedua merek tersebut sangatlah sama yaitu Logo Orang Menunggang Kuda Bermain Polo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam Peninjauan Kembali sangatlah bertentangan dengan prinsip-prinsip dalam TRIPs maupun ketentuan dalam Konvensi Paris yang telah diratifikasi di Indonesia. / The Judicial Review Verdict Number 162 PK / PDT.SUS / 2010 raises legal uncertainty because the rules contained in the Trademark of Article 3 provide exclusive rights to the registered trademark. But very contrary to the fact that PT. Manggala Putra Perkasa, the brand owner of Polo Ralph Laurent is not protected by the brand. This leads to their defeat to PT PrimaJaya Pantes Garment for the rights of using the brand and logo. The logo images that are owned by both brands are very similar which is, a horseman playing polo. The Supreme Court's Ruling in Review is very much against the principles of TRIPs and the provisions of the ratified Paris Convention in Indonesia.

Actions (login required)

View Item