Analisis yuridis tentang perlindungan hukum hak merek dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung nomor 595 K/PDT.SUS/2011

Sanjaya, Yap Robby (2013) Analisis yuridis tentang perlindungan hukum hak merek dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung nomor 595 K/PDT.SUS/2011. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title.pdf) 1.SAMPUL.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (966kB)
Preview	Text (Abstract.pdf) 2.ABSTRAK.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (6kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter1.pdf) 3.BAB I.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (24kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter2.pdf) 4.BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (71kB)
	Text (Chapter3.pdf) 5.BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (45kB)
	Text (Chapter4.pdf) 6.BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (8kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography.pdf) 7.DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (7kB) | Preview
	Text (Appendices.pdf) 8. LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (4MB)

Abstract

Merek secara esensi sangat berharga dan bernilai ekonomis tinggi karena menunjukkan identitas suatu barang dan menyangkut hak dan reputasi merek itu sendiri. Akan tetapi kenyataannya ada pihak tertentu yang beritikad tidak baik hendak memiliki merek orang lain yang sudah terkenal di masyarakat luas. Ada pihak yang memakai merek suatu barang lebih dulu, lalu beberapa waktu kemudian merek barang tersebut didaftarkan oleh pihak lain sehingga merek pada barang yang sejenis tersebut identik. Praktek persaingan curang ini banyak dijumpai dalam persaingan usaha di Indonesia pada saat ini dan peraturan￾peraturan yang diterapakan hakim dalam mengadili sengketa merek kurang mengakomodir perlindungan terhadap pemilik merek yang sebenarnya. Menyadari hal itu maka diperlukan adanya perlindungan hukum yang tepat terhadap pemegang hak merek sehingga mereknya dapat dilindungi dari kerugian akibat perbuatan curang tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui apakah putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam mengadili sengketa merek sudah memberikan perlindungan hukum yang tepat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif yakni upaya mencari penyelesaian masalah melalui studi kepustakaan dan hukum diartikan sebagai norma atau dogmatik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hakim dalam memberikan putusan belum mempertimbangkan fakta hukum yang ada secara komprehensif. Banyak ketentuan dalam undang-undang nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang merek belum diterapkan dengan benar sehingga belum memberikan perlindungan hukum hak merek yang seharusnya. / Brand is essentially very important and has high economic value for it shows the identity of a good and also related to the right and the reputation of the brand itself. However there are still some people that have bad faith to rob the brand of others that already well known in the public. Some people already had a brand for a good, but then that brand is registered by others so the brand of the certain good is identical. We can find a lot of unfair competitions nowadays and the rules that are used by the judges to adjudicate the dispute are so lack of protection toward the owner of the brand. Based on all those facts, so we really need the protection from the law to the owner of the brand so that the brand can be protected from the loss caused by those unfair competitions. This final paper is aim to know whether the conclusion and decision of The Supreme Court in adjudicating the dispute among brand already gave the proper protection to the owner of the brand or not. The method of the research tin this final paper is normative juridical that look for the way to solve the problems using the literatures and law that is interpreted as norm or dogma. The result of the research shows that the judges had not comprehensively considered the fact of the law in the decisions made. There are a lot of rules in the Act Number 15 year 2001 about Brand, have not applied well so it cannot give the total protection to the right of the brand like it had to be.

Actions (login required)

View Item