Analisis yuridis terhadap gugatan perusahaan Malaysia eik engineering sdn.bhd melawan pt engineering indonesia karya (Jakarta) terhadap penggunaan merek “eik” menurut undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2016 (studi kasus putusan no.1300k/pdt.sus-hki/2017)

Zahra, Jacqueline (2020) Analisis yuridis terhadap gugatan perusahaan Malaysia eik engineering sdn.bhd melawan pt engineering indonesia karya (Jakarta) terhadap penggunaan merek “eik” menurut undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2016 (studi kasus putusan no.1300k/pdt.sus-hki/2017). Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) Title - jacqueline.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (881kB)
Preview	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (182kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (199kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter1) Chapter1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (233kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter2) Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (295kB)
	Text (Chapter3) Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (234kB)
	Text (Chapter4) Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (428kB)
	Text (Chapter5) Chapter5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (192kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (199kB) | Preview
	Text (Appendices) Appendices.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (817kB)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the basic considerations of judges in the decision of the Commercial Court No 46 / Trademark / 2016 / PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Juncto of the Supreme Court ruling No. 1300k / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2017 is associated with the regulation of brand cancellation and equality in principle. to find out the arrangements regarding the cancellation of marks and equality in principle in Act Number 15 of 2001 concerning brands compared to Act Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. The research method used in this study is normative juridical library research. Normative juridical research is research that uses literature or secondary data for research. The results of the case study that will be examined and analyzed by the following authors explain the special civil case of trademark intellectual property rights between EIK ENGINEERING SDN BHD (Plaintiff) against PT ENGINEERING INDONESIA WORKS (Defendant), started when the plaintiff has the trademark "Eik" is a company which was founded in 2006 and is engaged in the business of producing amphibious excavators (Amphibious Excavators) along with the production of complementary equipment for various models of amphibious dredging machines. Beginning in 2012, the Plaintiff intends to expand its business in Indonesia by showing an authorized distributor to distribute Plaintiff's excavator products in Indonesia. The conclusion based on the judge's judgment at the Commercial Court level so that the trademark of PT Engineering Indonesia works can win the lawsuit, the judge argues legally if the Plaintiff is unable to prove the argument of the suit while the Defendant has been able to prove the argument of his rebuttal, therefore the judge is of the opinion that the Plaintiff's claim is groundless the law for that must be rejected for all. The basis of consideration of the Judge at the cassation level in deciding cases of trademark dispute between EIK Engineering SDN. BHD with PT Engineering Indonesia Karya is associated with cancellation regulations and equality in essence: 1. The common elements that form these brands. Whereas, there is an element of the word "EIK" in capital letters in the box design combined with a stripe where the placement of the word EIK is above the stripe in a combination of red black and white in the Defendant's "EIK" brand, clearly and clearly has similarities in with the Plaintiff's "EIK" trademark. 2. The same appearance that forms the "EIK" Brand. Based on the results of these considerations, the Supreme Court is of the opinion that there is sufficient reason to grant the appeal request from the Plaintiff, EIK ENGINEERING SDN. BHD., And cancel the Commercial Court Decision at the Central Jakarta District Court Number 46 / Pdt.Sus / Merel2016 / PN Niaga.Jkt.Pst., Dated 21 December 2016.

Actions (login required)

View Item