Tinjauan yuridis terhadap tanggung jawab direksi atas pelanggaran fiduciary duty dihubungkan dengan perkara perdata kia group nomor 204/pdt.g/2019/pn jkt.sel = Legal review: directors responsibility for fiduciary duty violations based on kia group civil lawsuit number 204 / pdt.g / 2019 / pn jkt.sel

Dewantara, Bagas (2020) Tinjauan yuridis terhadap tanggung jawab direksi atas pelanggaran fiduciary duty dihubungkan dengan perkara perdata kia group nomor 204/pdt.g/2019/pn jkt.sel = Legal review: directors responsibility for fiduciary duty violations based on kia group civil lawsuit number 204 / pdt.g / 2019 / pn jkt.sel. Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) 1. Title.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
Preview	Text (Abstract) 2. Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (133kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ToC) 3. ToC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (255kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter1) 4. Chapter1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (281kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter2) 5. Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (360kB)
	Text (Chapter3) 6. Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (227kB)
	Text (Chapter4) 7. Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (467kB)
	Text (Chapter5) 8. Chapter5 .pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (197kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography) 9. Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (236kB) | Preview

Abstract

Dalam penelitian ini, pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan Perundang-undangan dan juga pendekatan kasus, dengan menganalisa PERKARA PERDATA KIA GROUP NOMOR 204/Pdt.G/2019/PN JKT.SEL. Dari hasil penelitian tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa Peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang Perseroan Terbatas telah secara ekplisit mencantumkan kaidah-kaidah hukum terkait tanggung jawab Direksi atas pelanggaran fiduciary duty di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT). Perwujudan prinsip fiduciary duty dalam UUPT berhubungan dengan tugas dan tanggung jawab Direksi yang mendapat kepercayaan dari Perseroan untuk mengelola usaha. Dengan tegas UUPT menjelaskan bahwa setiap anggota Direksi bertanggung jawab penuh dan secara pribadi jika ia bersalah atau lalai dalam menjalankan tugas-tugasnya. Pada perkara gugatan perdata KIA Group Nomor 204/Pdt.G/2019/PN JKT.SEL., Direktur Utama digugat karena melakukan pelanggaran prinsip fiduciary duty. Putusan Majelis Hakim mengabulkan eksepsi tergugat dan menyatakan gugatan Para Penggugat tidak dapat diterima untuk seluruhnya, dengan mempertimbangkan legal standing dari penggugat dan tergugat, tanpa mempertimbangkan aspek materiel dari pokok perkara. / In this study, data collection was carried out using a statutory approach and also a case approach, namely PERKARA PERDATA KIA GROUP NUMBER 204 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN JKT.SEL. From the results of this research, it can be concluded that the statutory regulations governing Limited Liability Companies have explicitly stated the legal rules related to the responsibility of the Directors for violating fiduciary duty in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UUPT). Each member of the Board of Directors takes full and personal responsibility if he is guilty or negligent in carrying out his duties. In the case of KIA Group's civil lawsuit Number 204 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PN JKT.SEL., Where a President Director was sued for violating the principle of fiduciary duty. The verdict of the panel of judges is grant the defendant's exception and declare the Plaintiff's claim cannot be fully accepted, with considering the legal standing of the plaintiff and the defendant, without considering the material aspects of the subject matter.

Actions (login required)

View Item