Tindak pidana pencucian uang sebagai tindak pidana lanjutan dari perdagangan narkotika

Ginting, Yuni Priskila (2020) Tindak pidana pencucian uang sebagai tindak pidana lanjutan dari perdagangan narkotika. Doctoral thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) Title_watermark.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB) | Request a copy
Preview	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (211kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (236kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter1) Chapter1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (569kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter2) Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (610kB) | Request a copy
	Text (Chapter3) Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (383kB) | Request a copy
	Text (Chapter4) Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text (Chapter5) Chapter5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike. Download (247kB) | Request a copy
Preview	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (285kB) | Preview
	Text (Appendices) Appendices.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Predicate crime in the criminal act of money laundering reviewed by the positivism legality perspective is an absolute factor for money laundering crimes to occur. This is based on the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of Criminal Acts of Money Laundering. Implementation of the verification on criminal act of money laundering is apparent from provisions Article 77 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes. With this background, this research is conducted to examine three legal issues regarding the regulations of money laundering by proving the results of narcotics trafficking, carrying out enforcement of cases of criminal acts of money laundering resulting from narcotics trafficking and dealing with the regulation of money laundering of narcotics trafficking in the future. To answer the first legal problem researcher used proof theory. Researcher used law enforcement theory to answer the second legal problem. The theory of legal certainty is applied to answer the third legal problem. This research used normative juridical research methods and empirical legal research methods. The results showed that the regulation of money laundering by proving the results of narcotics trafficking as regulated in Law No.8 of 2010 concerning prevention and eradication of money laundering crimes and law no. 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics and related regulations are concurrent crimes, which stand alone and are not included in the continuing crime. In practice, prosecution of money laundering cases related to assets must be proven. Regulations are needed relating to evidence of the burden of proof reversed and evidence in the stage of investigation and investigation of the crime of money laundering in the narcotics trafficking by the offense. This study uses normative juridical research methods supported by empirical legal research methods. / Tindak pidana asal (predicate crime) dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang ditinjau dari perspektif legalitas positivisme merupakan syarat mutlak untuk dapat terjadinya tindak pidana pencucian uang. Hal ini berdasarkan pada ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Implementasi pembuktian tindak pidana narkotika sebagai tindak pidana asal (predicate crime) dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dapat terlihat dari ketentuan Pasal 77 UU No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Dengan latar belakang tersebut penelitia ini disusun dengan tujuan untuk menelaah tiga permasalahan hukum mengenai pengaturan mengenai tindak pidana pencucian uang dengan pembuktian hasil perdagangan narkotika, pelaksanaan penindakan kasus tindak pidana pencucian uang hasil perdagangan narkotika diatasi dan pengaturan tindak pidana pencucian uang hasil perdagangan narkotika dimasa mendatang. Untuk menjawab permasalahan hukum pertama digunakan teori pembuktian. Teori penegakan hukum untuk menjawab permasalahan hukum kedua. Teori Kepastian hukum diaplikasikan untuk menjawab permasalahann hukum ketiga. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan didukung metode penelitian hukum empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa, pengaturan tindak pidana pencucian uangn dengan pembuktian hasil perdagangan narkotika yang diatur dalam UU No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika dan peraturan terkait merupakan tindak pidana perbarengan, yang berdiri sendiri dan tidak termasuk kedalam tindak pidaa berlanjut. Dalam pelaksanaannya, penindakan kasus tindak pidana pencucian uang berkaitan dengan harta kekayaan dari tindak pidana asal yang wajib di buktikan. Diperlukan pengaturan terkait dengan alat bukti beban pembuktian terbalik dan barang bukti dalam tahap penyidikan dan penyelidikan tindak pidana pencucian uang hasil perdagangan narkotika yang sesuai dengan delik tindak pidana.

Actions (login required)

View Item