Tinjauan yuridis terhadap perlindungan hukum oleh pendaftar pertama hak atas merek di indonesia (studi kasus putusan mahkamah agung nomor 272 k/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016) = Juridical review of legal protection by the first register rights of the trademark in indonesia (case study decision of the supreme court of regulation number 272 k/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016)

Antoni, Andelton (2018) Tinjauan yuridis terhadap perlindungan hukum oleh pendaftar pertama hak atas merek di indonesia (studi kasus putusan mahkamah agung nomor 272 k/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016) = Juridical review of legal protection by the first register rights of the trademark in indonesia (case study decision of the supreme court of regulation number 272 k/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016). Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) Title.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
Preview	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (181kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (122kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter 1) Chapter 1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (357kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter 2) Chapter 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (350kB)
	Text (Chapter 3) Chapter 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (272kB)
	Text (Chapter 4) Chapter 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (429kB)
	Text (Chapter 5) Chapter 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (44kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (173kB) | Preview
	Text (Appendices) Appendices.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (638kB)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to assess how important role of trademark is as an instrument in trade activity so that it must be protected by the Law especially legal protection by the first registrant of rights to trademark based on first to file principle and evaluate judges' consideration in deciding the case of trademark deletion in list general trademarks in the Directorate General of IPR by foreign party as the actual owner of the mark in the Supreme Court decision Number 272 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2016. This research is a normative legal research that is qualitative. The approach used in this study is based on a statutory approach and a case approach. The regulation of brand protection for the first registrant of a trademark is specifically regulated in Law No. 15 of 2001 on the trademark. Also, the material used in this research is based on the primary legal material that the legislation relating to the trademarks and secondary legal materials in the form of books or literature related to the trademark, in addition to primary legal materials and secondary law materials of this research also use non legal materials containing legal information in the field of IPR by conducting interviews with a legal practitioner who usually handles cases especially in the field of Intellectual Property Rights Law. The law not only aims to protect the trademark but also has an important role in preventing fraudulent competition and consumer protection. Based on the judge's decision in the Supreme Court Decision Number 272 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2016., in the further detailing analysis, this research is to disagree with the statements of the panel of judges stating that the plaintiff is not an unauthorized third party in the trademark deletion lawsuit presented by the Panel of Judges which resulted in such rejection, whereas the dispute of the trademark deletion is not specifically regulated in the existing trademark regulations to equired the submission of Directorate General of IPR’s approval in filing a lawsuit.

Actions (login required)

View Item