Perlindungan merek dan penerapan asas Ne Bis In Idem dalam gugatan perkara merek berkelanjutan (studi kasus terhadap putusan peninjauan kembali no.57 Pk/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017) = Juridical analysis towards the cancelation of gold shine brand and Ne Bis In Idem principle according to case number 57 Pk/Pdt.Sus/2017

Golose, Christy Fredrika (2018) Perlindungan merek dan penerapan asas Ne Bis In Idem dalam gugatan perkara merek berkelanjutan (studi kasus terhadap putusan peninjauan kembali no.57 Pk/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017) = Juridical analysis towards the cancelation of gold shine brand and Ne Bis In Idem principle according to case number 57 Pk/Pdt.Sus/2017. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) Title.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (8MB)
Preview	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (107kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (168kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter 1) Chapter 1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (197kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter 2) Chapter 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (219kB)
	Text (Chapter 3) Chapter 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (159kB)
	Text (Chapter 4) Chapter 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (226kB)
	Text (Chapter 5) Chapter 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (150kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (134kB) | Preview

Abstract

Trade mark may be identified as pictures, names, words, letters, numbers, color composition, or a combination of the elements aforementioned which has a distinction significance utilized for commercial purposes. In implementation, there are still many cases that needs to be settle through court. The problem being discussed in this thesis is how does the law execute claim about trademark elimination based on law number 15 year 2001 on Trademark Law especially article 6. Also how ne bis in idem principle apply to continuous trademark claim. The method used in this scientific work is qualitative and juridical research. This study analyze current legal issues and relate them to regulations and applicable laws. Based on case number 57 PK/Pdt.Sus/2017, the plaintiff is GS YUASA Corporation who has registered the brand. The law suit filed against GOLD SHINE who’s re-registered the brand that has similar feature with the plaintiff’s. There had been a dispute back in 2006 along with a decision made by the judge through a case number 019 PK/Pdt.Sus/ 2007 that withdraw GOLD SHINE brand. GOLD SHINE, owned by the defendant should not be accepted when they re-registered because it has a very similar feature with GS YUASA and since GOLD SHINE re-registered the brand as a new one, ne bis in idem principle should not be applied.

Actions (login required)

View Item