When the marriage broke up because of divorce, community property is set according to each jurisdiction. The law is meant by each. Divorce disputes in court for the division of marital property along there a special form of confiscation is applied to assets with a husband-wife called marital foreclosure. Problems in this thesis is the implementation of the marital community property confiscated in the marriage due to divorce by Act 1 of 1974 About Marriage in the District Court's Decision No. 33/Pdt.G/2010 / PN.TNG and How to consideration of the judges in favor of marital foreclosure. The research method used is a normative legal research. Analysis of marital author seizes upon the implementation of joint property in marriage between the petitioner Tina Harun and Jeffry Buntaran is in conformity with the provisions of applicable laws. The purpose of the marital sita done between Tina Harun and Jeffry Buntaran is to prevent the division that is not appropriate based on community property, so as not to harm the party. Way of filing joint property can be done simultaneously with the action of divorce, child custody, child maintenance and a living wife or after a lawsuit filed separate divorce disconnected. Consideration of the District Court judge in Decision No. 33/Pdt.G/2010/PN.TNG about marital confiscation of property by the defendant of Tina Harun and Jeffry Buntaran is in conformity with the provisions of the legislation. Arrangement of the filing of the division of joint property contained in Article 37 of Law No. 1 of 1974 On the set of a marriage where the marriage if the marriage broke up because of divorce, community property is set by law each party is divorced. The article does not explain an arrangement regarding the filing of the petition with the division of property if it is associated with the filing of the divorce suit.