Creating order and promoting public welfare is basically a task that must be carried out by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia carried out by law enforcement officers. To ensure the occurrence of order that promotes the welfare of the community, these arrangements are set forth in Indonesian law, one of which is contained in the Criminal Code. One of the regulations is about corruption. Even though it has been regulated, it turns out that there are still many cases of corruption. One of the things that attracted the attention of many people was the case of corruption committed by law enforcement officers, namely the Pinangki Prosecutor. This study discusses the regulation of criminal sanctions against perpetrators of corruption in the form of bribes carried out by law enforcers in Indonesia and the basis for judges' considerations in deciding cases of bribery corruption committed by Pinangki, the Prosecutor, as mentioned in Central Jakarta High Court Decision Number 10/PID.TPK/ 2021/PT DKI. This research is juridical-empirical research, using secondary data types and interviews with Yoham Christianto and Fredy Hamid S.H. This research uses the law approach and the case approach. The results of the study show that the Prosecutor is a Law Enforcer and is included as a State Civil Apparatus (ASN). Prosecutors as law enforcers who commit bribery may be subject to provisions in Law Number 31 of 1999 amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. In the decision of the Pinangki Prosecutor's case, there were actually obstacles because of the 60% deduction that was made so that the Panel of Judges should have been able to dig deeper into the case because the actions of the Pinangki Prosecutor had a very broad impact.