Public awareness of the impact of verbal violence is getting higher. This is because of its long-term impact on a person's mental health. As a state of law, the protection of victims and criminal liability of perpetrators of cases of verbal violence should be regulated by laws and regulations. On this basis, the researcher conducted this research based on the Theory of Dignified Justice by conducting case studies related to verbal violence. This study will discuss the case and the judge's considerations in the Tanjung Karang District Court Decision Number 552/Pid.B/2019/PN.Tjk and also analyze the judge's consideration of the existence of verbal violence that causes criminal acts in the Tanjung Karang District Court Decision Number 552/Pid.B/2019PN.Tjk in accordance with the perspective of the Theory of Dignified Justice. This research is juridical-empirical research with a statutory approach and a case approach and with qualitative data analysis methods. The conclusion of this study is that although the perpetrators of the crime of verbal violence were punished, the punishment was considered light so that it was not in accordance with the perspective of Dignified Justice. In Indonesia, there are no explicit regulations governing verbal bullying, but such acts can be subject to Article 310-315 of the Criminal Code. In the Tanjung Karang District Court Decision Number 552/Pid.B/2019/PN.Tjk, the sentence of 15 days in prison for the perpetrator does not reflect the concept of dignified justice, considering that victims of verbal bullying have a fairly serious impact, namely psychological injuries that take longer time to heal.