ABSTRACT “DIFFERENCES IN THE VALUE OF COMPENSATION FOR LAND PROCUREMENT FOR PUBLIC INTEREST” (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number: 1875K/Pdt/2016) One of the problems causing disagreements in land acquisition for public purposes is the difference in the assessment of compensation between the land acquisition committee represented by the public appraiser and the party entitled to the land. The assessment carried out by the land acquisition committee is often responded with an attitude of rejection by the party entitled to the land because the valuation is often far from the actual land value and does not value certain objects that should be part of the land value assessment which creates an unfair impression in the assessment. This research reveals a proper and fair assessment of land value based on the law on land acquisition for public interest which contains the rights and obligations of the parties. In this study using normative legal research methods, namely by collecting and analyzing statutory data and literature. The results of this study indicate that the assessment of land value for land acquisition does not only assess land objects but other factors such as buildings, plants, objects related to land and other losses that can be assessed. So that if the assessment of these factors is carried out, a fair and proper assessment will be created based on statutory provisions. Key word: Land Acquisition, land value, Public Appraiser, Public Interested References: 20 (1987-2020)