Health development is a form of national development that continues to be carried out to increase the awareness, desire, and will of the Indonesian people to continue to live healthy lives. Currently, the definition of health is no longer limited to preventing the body from getting sick but also having a beautiful body. This understanding is one of many reasons why the practice of medical aesthetics is becoming more and more accessible. However, the needs of the community with the available Human Resources do not have a balance. This means that the need for specialist doctors who have clinical authority to practice aesthetics is still very small. This causes general practitioners to take part in medical aesthetic practices in various healthcare facilities. In this study, the author raises two problem formulations: how the clinical privilege limits general practitioners in carrying out medical aesthetic practices and legal responsibility for general practitioners when carrying out medical aesthetic malpractice. This research aims to determine the limits of the clinical authority of general practitioners in carrying out medical aesthetic practices and the legal responsibility for general practitioners who carry out medical aesthetic malpractice according to Indonesian laws and regulations. Based on the results of data processing as outlined in the research results, before carrying out medical aesthetic practices general practitioners need to master medical professional standards such as SKDI and SPPDI which have currently been compiled into the same document, namely SNPPDI 2019. If general practitioners provide medical aesthetic services outside of what has been determined and cause harm to the patient, the general practitioner must be responsible for the provisions contained in the currently applicable laws and regulations.