This study aims to evaluate on judicial review of partnership agreement concerned on the way of suspend’s work. This study is a empiric-normative approaches which means this research are review on Gojek’s partnership agreement, rules related on partnership agreement and do interview to driver which is get impact by this partnership agreement. the type of data on this study is secondary legal materials and interview some of Gojek’s driver. Data collection techniques is qualitative approaches which is the problem will described based on the result of the interviews and Gojek’s partnership agreement. Suspend is one of the problem that come up by the consequences of agree on Gojek’s partnership agreement which is the requirement to be a driver based on partnership relationship. As normative view, Gojek’s driver is partner to the gojek’s company but the otherside gojek’s driver looks like have a working relationship to the gojek’s company. According to the research, the legal standing of gojek’s driver is not equal to the company which on partnership relationship, the partner should be equal. So it will get impact on the way of suspend’s work which is make by the company. But the condition of the way suspends work is now getting better although there is some problems, example suddenly suspended towards driver. As a result, the company try to following the rules but the way of suspends work still not fair enough to the driver and violated rules which is made by minister of transportation. The conclusion there is some violation on the way of suspend’s work that must be fix or amendment adapting a sense of justice that appears on gojek’s driver community.