Laura, Florencia (2023) analisis perbandingan metode SAW dengan TOPSIS dalam pemilihan air fryer terbaik. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.
Preview
Title.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (270kB) | Preview
Preview
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (316kB) | Preview
Preview
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (796kB) | Preview
Preview
Chapter1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB) | Preview
![Chapter2 [thumbnail of Chapter2]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (3MB)
![Chapter3 [thumbnail of Chapter3]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Chapter3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (3MB)
![Chapter4 [thumbnail of Chapter4]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (4MB)
![Chapter5 [thumbnail of Chapter5]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Chapter5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (341kB)
Preview
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (514kB) | Preview
![Appendices [thumbnail of Appendices]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Appendices.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (8MB)
Abstract
During the pandemic, people tend to spend time at home, which causes the demand for digital kitchen appliances to increase quite drastically. One of the popular appliances is the air fryer which can help to reduce the excessive oil content in a food, this apparatus may produce a good impact for health. Along with the benefit offered by air fryer, its user keeps increasing occasionally. This situation causes many electronic companies to compete in producing various types of air fryers with different specifications.
On the other hand, various types of air fryers on the market have created difficulty for new buyers to make good choice given minimal information about the air fryer, therefore a practical assessment is needed to help users choose the best air fryer. In this study, two methods will be applied, namely SAW and TOPSIS. Through comparison, it is determined which method works better for selecting an air fryer. Based on the results, it shows that each method gives a different rank of air fryers. According to SAW the first ranked air fryer it suggests is A66 (Kaisa Villa Air Fryer); while the TOPSIS method places A27 (Han River Air Fryer HRAF05) in the top list. The suitability level of SAW is 99.9961%; while for TOPSIS is 99.9951%. It is concluded that SAW is recommended for selecting the best air fryer./ Pada saat pandemi masyarakat cenderung menghabiskan waktu di rumah yang menjadikan permintaan akan alat dapur digital meningkat cukup drastis. Salah satu alat yang sedang populer saat ini adalah air fryer, penggunaan air fryer dapat meminimalkan minyak yang berlebihan pada makanan sehingga dapat berdampak baik bagi kesehatan. Kelebihan tersebut menjadikan penggunaan air fryer meningkat yang dimana membuat perusahaan elektronik bersaing dalam mengeluarkan berbagai macam tipe air fryer dengan spesifikasi yang berbeda.
Dari berbagai macam air fryer yang berada di pasaran membuat pembeli awam sulit untuk menentukan pilihan dengan informasi yang minim, sehingga membutuhkan sebuah perhitungan dengan penilaian yang adil untuk menghasilkan keputusan yang dapat membantu dalam pemilihan air fryer terbaik. Pada penelitian ini akan menerapkan metode SAW dan TOPSIS. Kedua metode akan dilakukan perbandingan untuk menemukan metode terbaik untuk diimplementasikan sesuai kriteria dalam pemilihan air fryer. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan pada hasil perangkingan yang dimana peringkat pertama untuk metode SAW berada pada A66 (Kaisa Villa Air Fryer) sedangkan untuk metode TOPSIS berada pada A27 (Han River Air Fryer HRFA05). Kemudian hasil tingkat kesesuaian yang didapatkan metode SAW adalah 99.9961% dan metode TOPSIS adalah 99.9951% sehingga metode SAW lebih disarankan untuk diimplementasikan dalam pemilihan air fryer terbaik.
Item Type: | Thesis (Bachelor) |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators NIM Email ORCID Laura, Florencia NIM03081190026 flo.laura26@gmail.com UNSPECIFIED |
Contributors: | Contribution Contributors NIDN/NIDK Email Thesis advisor Romindo, Romindo NIDN0111119101 romindo@uph.edu |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | air fryer, metode SAW, metode TOPSIS, perbandingan, tingkat kesesuaian |
Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
Divisions: | University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Medan > School of Information Science and Technology > Information Systems Current > Faculty/School - UPH Medan > School of Information Science and Technology > Information Systems |
Depositing User: | Users 23454 not found. |
Date Deposited: | 19 Aug 2023 08:31 |
Last Modified: | 19 Aug 2023 08:31 |
URI: | http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/57813 |