Makmur, Wilfred Ivaniel (2023) Analisis pelaksanaan putusan mahkamah konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 tentang kekuatan eksekutorial perjanjian jaminan fidusia berdasarkan undang-undang nomor 42 tahun 1999 tentang jaminan fidusia. Bachelor thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.
|
Text (Title)
Title.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (33kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (Abstract)
Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (185kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (Toc)
Toc.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (938kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (Chapter1)
Chapter1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (413kB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Text (Chapter2)
Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (274kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (Chapter3)
Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (47kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (Chapter4)
Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (612kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (Chapter5)
Chapter5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (24kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (Chapter6)
Chapter6.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (4MB) |
|
|
Text (Bibliography)
Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (156kB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Text (Appendices)
Appendices.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (813kB) |
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan pelaksanaan Undang-Undang No. 42 tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia sebelum dan pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU- XVII/2019. Dan Un- tuk mengetahui implementasi pelaksanan hak Jaminan Fidusia dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 345/PDT.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel. Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan penulis merupakan metode penelitian. Penelitian Hukum Normatif yang merupakan sebuah penelitian yang meneliti hukum secara murni dan memberikan suatu pandangan terhadap hukum sebagai suatu ilmu yang mandiri tanpa dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor empir- is.Penelitian Empiris yang merupukan sebuah metode penelitian dengan menggunakan metode wawancara yang akan dijadikan sebagai sumber dukungan data pada penulisan penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian dalam penulisan skripsi terdapat sejumlah hal setelah penelitian ini dilakukan. Yaitu terdapat sejumlah perbandingan pelaksanaan Un- dang-Undang No. 42 tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia sebelum dan pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU- XVII/2019. Perbe- daan yang terdapat pada mekanisme pelaksanaan eksekusi jaminan fidusia. Sebe- lumnya, pihak kreditur dapat mengeksekusi objek jaminan fidusia hanya dengan sertifikat jaminan fidusia. Setelah keluarnya putusan tersebut, maka terjadi peru- bahan pada mekanisme eksekusi yaitu ketika debitur tidak merelakan objek ja- minan fidusia untuk di eksekusi, maka mekanisme eksekusi harus dilakukan me- lalui pengadilan negeri setempat. Kemudian mengenai implementasi pada pelaksanan hak Jaminan Fidusia dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Se- latan No. 345/PDT.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel pada penelitian ini putusan tersebut tidak dilaksanakan sesuai dengan perkembangan hari ini, putusan tersebut tidak mem- berikan pengaruh yang besar sehingga kreditur baik dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 345/PDT.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel tidak mematuhi putusan tersebut. wawancara yang dilakukan pada penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa kreditur hingga pada hari ini tidak patuh pada putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 18/PUU-XVII/2019. / The purpose of this research is to determine the comparison of the im- plementation of Law no. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees before and after the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. And to find out the implementation of Fiduciary Guarantee rights in the South Jakarta District Court Decision No. 345/PDT.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel. The research method used by the author is a research method. Normative Legal Research which is research that examines law purely and provides a view of law as an independent science without being influenced by empirical factors. Empirical Research which is a research method using interview methods which will be used as a source of data support in writing this research. The results of research in writing a thesis include a number of things af- ter this research was carried out. Namely, there are a number of comparisons in the implementation of Law no. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees be- fore and after the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU- XVII/2019. The differences exist in the mechanism for executing fiduciary guaran- tees. Previously, creditors could execute fiduciary collateral objects only with a fiduciary guarantee certificate. After the decision was issued, there was a change in the execution mechanism, namely when the debtor did not give up the object of the fiduciary guarantee for execution, the execution mechanism had to be carried out through the local district court. Then regarding the implementation of Fiduci- ary Guarantee rights in the South Jakarta District Court Decision No. 345/PDT.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel in this research the decision was not implemented in accordance with today's developments, the decision did not have a big influence so that creditors both in the decision of the South Jakarta District Court No. 345/PDT.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel does not comply with the decision. interviews con- ducted during the research can be concluded that creditors to this day do not comply with the Constitutional Court decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.
Item Type: | Thesis (Bachelor) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||||
Contributors: |
|
||||||||
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Jaminan Fidusia; Kreditur; Debitur; Eksekusi; Putusan | ||||||||
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) | ||||||||
Depositing User: | Wilfred Makmur | ||||||||
Date Deposited: | 13 Feb 2024 12:30 | ||||||||
Last Modified: | 13 Feb 2024 12:30 | ||||||||
URI: | http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/61899 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |