Piter, Risen yan (2017) Ketidakpastian hukum dalam penyelenggaraan rapat umum pemegang saham yang ketiga. Doctoral thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.
![Title [thumbnail of Title]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
98654 (1).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (847kB)
Preview
98654 (2).pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (390kB) | Preview
Preview
98654 (3).pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (387kB) | Preview
Preview
98654 (4).pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (628kB) | Preview
![Chapter 2 [thumbnail of Chapter 2]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
98654 (5).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB)
![Chapter 3 [thumbnail of Chapter 3]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
98654 (6).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (454kB)
![Chapter 4 [thumbnail of Chapter 4]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
98654 (7).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB)
![Chapter 5 [thumbnail of Chapter 5]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
98654 (8).pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (448kB)
Preview
98654 (9).pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (729kB) | Preview
Abstract
General Meeting of Shareholders which consists Shareholders is the highest
decision maker in a Limited Liability Company. Law Number 40 of 2007 on
Limited Liability Companies stipulates the requirements in convening a General
Meeting of Shareholders, among others the quorum and approval of a decision
requirements. The general quorum requirement of a General Meeting of
Shareholders is more than one half of the total number of shares with voting rights
are present. If the quorum requirement for the first General Meeting of Shareholders
is not achieved, the second General Meeting of Shareholders may be held with a
quorum of at least one third of the total number of shares with voting rights are
present. In the event that the quorum requirement for the second General Meeting
of Shareholders is also not achieved, the Limited Liability Company concerned may
submit an application to the District Court whose jurisdiction covers such Limited
Liability Company’s domicile to convene a third General Meeting of Shareholders
with a quorum requirement as determined by the Court. Considering that the
Company Law only allows the convening of a General Meeting of Shareholders for
maximum three times, it means the third General Meeting of Shareholders is very
crucial. The Company Law stipulates the requirements for convening a third
General Meeting of Shareholders, among others as stipulated in Article 86.
However, practically, not all of such requirements is complied to and therefore
creates legal uncertainty in the third General Meeting of Shareholders. For example,
Article 86 paragraph 7 of Company Law states that the verdict of the District Court
regarding quorum of the third General Meeting of Shareholders as stipulated in
paragraph 5 is final and has absolute legal effect, however in practice that verdict
can be appealed even until the Supreme Court level whereby the higher judicial
institution did not refuse the appeal or cassation application based on such Article
86 paragraph 7. Furthermore, the explanation of Article 86 paragraph 7 does not
explicitly include perlawanan therefore a party may use that opportunity to submit
perlawanan on such verdict. This research is conducted based on literature research
method which is normative juridical, that is conducted by reviewing various
literature which is unlimited by the time and place, and conducted by reviewing
various literature such as books, the result of previos research, or the laws both in
print and online related to matters researched. / Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham, yang terdiri dari pemegang saham, adalah
pemegang keputusan tertinggi dalam suatu Perseroan Terbatas. Undang-Undang
Nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas memberikan syarat-syarat
penyelenggaraan suatu Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham, antara lain adalah syarat
kuorum dan syarat persetujuan atas suatu keputusan. Syarat umum kuorum Rapat
Umum Pemegang Saham pertama adalah jika lebih dari satu per dua bagian dari
jumlah seluruh saham dengan hak suara hadir. Jika syarat kuorum untuk Rapat
Umum Pemegang Saham pertama tidak tercapai, maka dapat diadakan Rapat Umum
Pemegang Saham kedua dengan syarat kuorum setidaknya satu per tiga dari jumlah
seluruh saham dengan hak suara hadir. Jika syarat kuorum untuk Rapat Umum
Pemegang Saham kedua juga tidak dapat dipenuhi, maka Perseroan Terbatas tersebut
dapat mengajukan permohonan kepada Pengadilan Negeri yang wilayah
yurisdiksinya mencakup domisili Perseroan Terbatas tersebut untuk mengadakan
Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham ketiga dengan syarat kuorum yang ditentukan oleh
Pengadilan. Mengingat Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas hanya memperkenankan
penyelenggaraan suatu Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham maksimal sampai dengan tiga
kali, maka Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham ketiga ini sangatlah penting. UndangUndang Perseroan Terbatas telah memberikan syarat-syarat penyelenggaraan Rapat
Umum Pemegang Saham ketiga, antara lain sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 86.
Namun demikian, pada prakteknya tidak semua syarat-syarat tersebut ditaati sehingga
dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam penyelenggaraan Rapat Umum
Pemegang Saham ketiga. Sebagai contoh, Pasal 86 ayat 7 Undang-Undang Perseroan
Terbatas menyatakan bahwa Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri mengenai kuorum Rapat
Umum Pemegang Saham ketiga bersifat final dan mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap,
namun pada prakteknya terhadap suatu penetapan kuorum Rapat Umum Pemegang
Saham ketiga diajukan upaya hukum banding bahkan sampai tingkat kasasi dimana
lembaga pengadilan yang lebih tinggi tidak menolak permohonan banding atau kasasi
tersebut atas dasar pasal 86 ayat 7. Lebih lanjut, karena penjelasan Pasal 86 ayat 7
tidak menyatakan secara tegas terhadap penetapan tersebut tidak dapat diajukan
perlawanan maka suatu pihak dapat saja mengajukan perlawanan. Penelitian ini
dilakukan berdasarkan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif,
yakni yang dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji berbagai literatur yang sifatnya tidak
terbatas oleh waktu dan tempat, dan dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji berbagai
literatur baik yang berupa buku-buku, hasil penelitian sebelumnya maupun peraturan
perundang-undangan baik cetak maupun online yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan
yang diteliti.
Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators NIM Email ORCID Piter, Risen yan NIM00001931 UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED |
Contributors: | Contribution Contributors NIDN/NIDK Email Thesis advisor Soebagjo, Felix O. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Thesis advisor Sihombing, Jonker NIDN8838820016 UNSPECIFIED |
Additional Information: | D 57-12 PIT k |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Doctor of Law Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Doctor of Law |
Depositing User: | Phillips Iman Heri Wahyudi |
Date Deposited: | 19 Nov 2020 04:36 |
Last Modified: | 09 Nov 2021 03:49 |
URI: | http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/12267 |