Armansyah, Muhamad Restu (2020) Kewenangan pengadilan negeri dan pengadilan niaga dalam mengadili gugatan pengembalian kelebihan pembayaran utang kepailitan (studi kasus perkara No. 371/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel) = The authority of the state court and the niaga court in adjusting title for return of extensive payment of debt debt (case study cases No. 371/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel). Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.
![Title [thumbnail of Title]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
ilovepdf_merged.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (8MB)
Preview
Abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (87kB) | Preview
Preview
ToC.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (111kB) | Preview
Preview
Chapter1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB) | Preview
![Chapter2 [thumbnail of Chapter2]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Chapter2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB)
![Chapter3 [thumbnail of Chapter3]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Chapter3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB)
![Chapter4 [thumbnail of Chapter4]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Chapter4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB)
![Chapter5 [thumbnail of Chapter5]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Chapter5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB)
Preview
Bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (1MB) | Preview
Abstract
Tesis ini membahas mengenai kewenangan Pengadilan dalam Kelebihan Pembayaran utang dalam Kepailitan, pengertian Pailit menurut Undang – Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang yaitu Kepailitan adalah sita umum atas semua kekayaan Debitor Pailit yang pengurusan dan pemberesannya dilakukan oleh Kurator di bawah pengawasan Hakim Pengawas sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang ini. adapun kewenangan pengadilan yang mengadili perkara Kepailitan yaitu Pengadilan niaga dan Pengadilan Niaga merupakan bagian dari pengadilan umum yang mempunyai kompetensi untuk memeriksa, dan memutus perkara-perkara kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang, serta perkara-perkara lainnya dibidang perniagaan yang ditetapkan dengan peraturan pemerintah.Jenis penelitian dalam tesis ini adalah Yuridis Normatif, jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Data Sekunder, cara perolehan data menggunakan studi kepustakaan, Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan undang- undang, Analisa yang digunakan dalam penulisan tesis ini adalah deduktif kualitatif, hasil dari penelitian tesis ini yaitu kewenangan yang berhak untuk mengadili perkara kelebihan pembayaran utang Kepailitan yaitu Pengadilan Niaga yang berdasarkan Undang – Undang Kepailitan. / This thesis discusses the authority of the Court in Overpayment of Debt in Bankruptcy, the definition of Bankruptcy according to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, namely Bankruptcy is general confiscation of all assets of the Bankrupt Debtor whose management and settlement is carried out by the Curator under supervision. The Supervisory Judge as stipulated in this Law, as well as the authority of the court to adjudicate Bankruptcy cases, namely the Commercial Court and the Commercial Court are part of the general court that has the competence to examine and decide bankruptcy cases and postponement of debt payment obligations, as well as cases others are in the field of commerce as stipulated by government regulations.The type of research in this thesis is juridical normative, the type of data used in this research is secondary data, the method of obtaining data using literature study, the approach used in this research is the statutory approach, the analysis used in the writing of this thesis is qualitative deductive, The result of this thesis research is that the authorities have the right to adjudicate cases of overpayment of Bankruptcy debt, namely the Commercial Court based on the Bankruptcy Law.
Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators NIM Email ORCID Armansyah, Muhamad Restu NIM01659190018 restu_armansyah@yahoo.com UNSPECIFIED |
Contributors: | Contribution Contributors NIDN/NIDK Email Thesis advisor Purwaka, Tommy Hendra NIDN9903259401 tommypurwaka@gmail.com |
Additional Information: | T 59-19 ARM k |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | commercial court; south jakarta court; bankruptcy |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Law Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Law |
Depositing User: | Users 14345 not found. |
Date Deposited: | 09 Mar 2021 08:14 |
Last Modified: | 16 Aug 2021 03:11 |
URI: | http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/24418 |