Putri, Zahrina Rianti (2018) Kewenangan majelis pengawas wilayah notaris terhadap notaris yang melakukan penggelapan uang pajak berdasarkan undang-undang jabatan notaris (studi kasus: putusan nomor: 03/pts/mj.pwn.prov.DKI Jakarta/vi/2015). Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.
![Title [thumbnail of Title]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
title.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (946kB)
![Abstract [thumbnail of Abstract]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
abstract.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (165kB)
![ToC [thumbnail of ToC]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
toc.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (267kB)
![Chapter 1 [thumbnail of Chapter 1]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
chapter 1.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (239kB)
![Chapter 2 [thumbnail of Chapter 2]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
chapter 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (494kB)
![Chapter 3 [thumbnail of Chapter 3]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
chapter 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (242kB)
![Chapter 4 [thumbnail of Chapter 4]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
chapter 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (199kB)
![Chapter 5 [thumbnail of Chapter 5]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
chapter 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (164kB)
![Bibliography [thumbnail of Bibliography]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
bibliography.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (240kB)
![Appendices [thumbnail of Appendices]](http://repository.uph.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
appendices.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (3MB)
Abstract
Notary as a Land Titles Registrar in doing his work as a deed, can not be
separated from taxation which directly confronts the prospective taxpayer. Where
the process of handling certificates, switching or reversing the name of the
certificate the condition is the payment of taxes BPHTB and PPh. The payment of
taxes BPHTB and PPh is the obligation of the taxpayer, but the payment can be
made by a notary. A notary in their position as an official of land deed in taking
care of his client is classified as a trust position. However, the trust that given by
the client to the notary is misused by not paying the tax BPHTB. This is
evidenced by the existence of the case that the author have found in The Central
Supervisory Council of Notaries Decision Number 03/PTS/Mj.PWN.Prov. DKI.
Jakarta/VI/2015. The problem in this case is how the authority of the regional
supervisory board against the notary who is embezzling tax money and how
sanctions will be provided by the regional supervisory board to a notary who is
proven to commit tax evasion. The author uses normative research methods. Data
collection is done by using the law approach that is UUJN and case approach in
verdict number 03/PTS/Mj.PWN.Prov.DKI.Jakarta/VI/2015. The data used is
secondary data. Secondary data obtained from library materials in the form of
primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.
Based on the results of research conducted by the author it is known that the
authority of the regional supervisory board against a notary who is embezzling tax
money is to impose sanctions against a notary who is proven to embezzle tax
money. The sanction is given because the notary is proven to violate the
provisions article 16 clause 1 letters a and e. The sanction granted to a notary who
is evidently embezzling the tax money is sanctions in the form of proposed
temporary dismissal for three months because it has become the authority of the
regional supervisory board. / Notaris selaku Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam melakukan
pekerjaannya sebagai pembuat akta, tidak bisa lepas dari perpajakan yang secara
langsung berhadapan dengan calon wajib pajak. Dimana proses pengurusan
sertifikat, peralihan atau balik nama sertifikat syaratnya adalah pembayaran pajak
BPHTB dan PPh. Pembayaran pajak BPHTB dan PPh ini merupakan kewajiban
dari wajib pajak, namun pembayaran tersebut bisa dilakukan oleh Notaris. Jabatan
Notaris dalam kedudukannya sebagai PPAT dalam mengurus kliennya
digolongkan sebagai jabatan kepercayaan. Akan tetapi kepercayaan yang
diberikan klien kepada Notaris justru disalahgunakan dengan cara tidak
membayarkan pajak BPHTB tersebut. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan adanya suatu
kasus yang penulis temukan dalam Putusan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris
Nomor 03/PTS/Mj.PWN.Prov.DKI.Jakarta/VI/2015. Permasalahan dalam hal ini
adalah bagaimana kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris terhadap
Notaris yang melakukan penggelapan uang pajak dan bagaimana sanksi yang akan
diberikan oleh Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris kepada Notaris yang terbukti
telah melakukan penggelapan uang pajak. Penulis menggunakan metode
penelitian normatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan
pendekatan undang-undang yaitu UUJN dan pendekatan kasus yaitu Putusan
Nomor 03/PTS/Mj.PWN.Prov.DKI.Jakarta/VI/2015. Data yang digunakan adalah
data sekunder. Data sekunder yang diperoleh dari bahan-bahan kepustakaan
berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis maka diketahui bahwa
kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris terhadap Notaris yang melakukan
penggelapan uang pajak adalah memberikan sanksi terhadap Notaris yang terbukti
menggelapkan uang pajak. Pemberian sanksi dikarenakan Notaris tersebut terbukti
melanggar ketentuan Pasal 16 ayat 1 huruf a dan e. Sanksi yang akan diberikan
kepada Notaris yang terbukti menggelapkan uang pajak ialah sanksi berupa usulan
pemberhentian sementara selama 3 (tiga) bulan karena memang sudah menjadi
kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris.
Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators NIM Email ORCID Putri, Zahrina Rianti NIM00000026573 UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED |
Contributors: | Contribution Contributors NIDN/NIDK Email Thesis advisor Tukgali, Lieke L. NIDN8826150017 UNSPECIFIED |
Additional Information: | T 56-16 PUT k |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Notary ; embezzlement of tax money |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | University Subject > Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary Current > Faculty/School - UPH Karawaci > Faculty of Law > Master of Notary |
Depositing User: | Users 15 not found. |
Date Deposited: | 19 Jun 2019 03:19 |
Last Modified: | 05 Nov 2021 06:56 |
URI: | http://repository.uph.edu/id/eprint/3393 |