Pretrial review function is to examine the legal validity of forced effort by the law enforcer such as arrest, detention, the termination of investigation, the termination of prosecution, seizure and searching. According to the Law of Republic Indonesia Number 8 Year 1981 concerning The Law of Criminal Procedural, judge as the officials of the court has only authority to examine the case submitted to him. In early 2018, the Anti Corruption Community of Indonesia filed pretrial request to South Jakarta District Court in respect of the termination of investigation on Century Bank corruption case. The pretrial applicant demands the judge to give orders toward Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia to do investigation and assign suspect over Boediono, Muliaman D Hadad, Raden Pardede, and others as stated at the indichtment letter of Budi Mulya. The judge who examine the request stated to order Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia to do investigation and determination suspect over those names that the applicant mentioned. The writer sees the inconcistency of the judge to apply the rule of law which set up in The Law of Criminal Procedural. According to The Law of Criminal Procedural, Judge has no authority to give investigation order and determination suspect order. The one who has authority is only the investigator as mentioned in The Law of Criminal Procedural. Based on this, the writer conduct a judicial review over the judge decision that is contrary to the The Law of Criminal Procedural. The writer using normative research with literature data collection techniques. To support the information provided in this paper, the writer interviewed investigator of the Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia. The author conclude that the judge who decide the case has exceeded his authority which is regulated in the laws and regulations.