Akibat hukum tidak dilaksanakannya suatu putusan tentang kewajiban pemberian hibah (studi kasus putusan nomor 378/PDT.G/2006/PA.TGRS)

Sakti, Eduward Ijakus (2020) Akibat hukum tidak dilaksanakannya suatu putusan tentang kewajiban pemberian hibah (studi kasus putusan nomor 378/PDT.G/2006/PA.TGRS). Masters thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan.

	Text (Title) ilovepdf_merged (1).pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
Preview	Text (Abstract) Abstract.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (215kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ToC) ToC.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (539kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Chapter1) Chapter1.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (511kB) | Preview
	Text (Chapter2) Chapter2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (766kB)
	Text (Chapter3) Chapter3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (270kB)
	Text (Chapter4) Chapter4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (554kB)
	Text (Chapter5) Chapter5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (261kB)
Preview	Text (Bibliography) Bibliography.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (430kB) | Preview
	Text (Appendices) Appendices.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (573kB)

Abstract

Penelitian hukum ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kekuatan hukum suatu amar putusan pengadilan agama berkekuatan hukum tetap yang mewajibkan pemberian hibah orang tua kepada anak dan suatu amar putusan yang mewajibkan pemberian hibah tanah dari orang tua kepada anak yang tidak dilaksanakan oleh salah satu orang tua (dalam hal ini seorang suami). Selain itu, juga bertujuan untuk mempelajari putusan pengadilan yang pelaksanaan salah satu amar putusannya harus terlebih dahulu mengajukan permohonan eksekusikepada pengadilan. Penulis menggunakan penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Putusan Nomor 378/Pdt.G/2006/PA.TGRS telah berkekuatan hukum tetap. Putusan yang telah berkekuatan hukum akan mengikat para pihak. Dalam hal salah satu amar putusan pengadilan yang mewajibkan pemberian hibah harta bersama dari orang tua kepada anak tidak dilaksanakan oleh salah satu orang tua, maka hal tersebut mengakibatkan salah satu amar putusan pengadilan tersebut tidak dapat dilaksanakan secara langsung. Hal ini dikarenakan tanah yang telah dinyatakan harta bersama oleh pengadilan harus dihibahkan dengan penandatanganan akta hibah oleh kedua orang tua di hadapan pejabat pembuat akta tanah. Putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum memiliki kekuatan mengikat bagi para pihak, kekuatan pembuktian dan kekuatan eksekusi. Apabila amar putusan pengadilan terkait pelaksanaan hibah tidak dapat dilaksanakan, dikarenakan tidak semua putusan dapat dieksekusi secara langsung, maka diperlukan pengajuan permohonan eksekusi kepada pengadilan sehingga pelaksanaan hibah dapat dilaksanakan dan proses balik nama dapat dilaksanakan di kantor pertanahan. / This legal research aims to find out the legal power of a religious court ruling with a permanent legal force that oblige parents to give the grants to the children and a ruling that oblige to give the grants of land from parents to the children that are not conducted by a parent (in this case a husband). In addition, it also aims to study the court decisions that the implementation of one of the decisions ruling must first submit an application for execution to the court. The Author uses normative juridical legal research and using the secondary data. Decision Number 378/Pdt.G/2006/PA.TGRS has permanent legal force. Decisions that have legal force will bind to the parties. In the case of one of the court decisions which oblige the giving of joint asset from parents to the children is not conducted by one of the parents, then that case made one of the court decisions can not being implemented directly. This is because of the land that has been declared as joint asset by the court must be granted with the execution of a grant deed by both parents in the presence of the official land deed maker. The court's decision which has legal force has binding power for the parties, the strength of proof and the power of execution. If the court's decision related to the implementation of the grant can not be implemented, therefore, because of not all decisions are executable directly, it is necessary to submit an application for execution to the court so that the implementation of the grant can be conducted and the transfer process can be conducted at the land office.

Actions (login required)

View Item